BR 05
ReferenceBR05A-GR-ST/SRB
Bell & Ross2019
- Case
- 40 mm · Stainless steel
- Thickness
- 10.4 mm
- Water
- 100 m
- Calibre
- BR-CAL.321 · 38 h
- Dial
- Silver
Description
The Bell & Ross BR 05 BR05A-GR-ST/SRB was introduced in 2019. It has a 40 mm stainless steel case, 10.4 mm thick and water-resistant to 100 m. It has a silver sunburst dial with mixed indices. It uses the automatic calibre BR-CAL.321, with a 38-hour power reserve. Its functions include date.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- BR 05
- Status
- Unknown
- Introduced
- 2019
Dial
- Colour
- Silver
- Pattern
- Sunburst
- Indices
- Mixed
- Hands
- Baton
Movement
- Calibre
- Bell & Ross BR-CAL.321
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 38 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 25
- Functions
- DateHoursMinutesSeconds
- Complications
- Date
Case
- Shape
- Square
- Diameter
- 40 mm
- Thickness
- 10.4 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 100 m
Talk
Closest by specs
- NOMOS GlashütteClub Sport neomatik Worldtimer silver791Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve
- NOMOS GlashütteClub Sport neomatik Worldtimer silver791 SBSame: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve
- BreitlingChronomat 40 GMTA32398101A1Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve
- BreitlingPremier Automatic 40A37340351G1Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve
- Glashütte OriginalSeventies Panorama Date2-39-47-11-12Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 40 h reserve
- OmegaSpeedmaster Date 403211.31Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve
- OmegaSpeedmaster Date 403211.30Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve
- Bell & RossBR 05BR05A-GR-ST/SSTSame: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.