No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Villeret Tourbillon 8 Jours
Reference6025 3642
- Case
- 37.5 mm · 18k rose gold
- Thickness
- 10.3 mm
- Water
- 30 m
- Calibre
- Blancpain 25 · 192 h
- Dial
- White
Description
The Blancpain Villeret Tourbillon 8 Jours 6025 3642 has a 37.5 mm 18k rose gold case, 10.3 mm thick and water-resistant to 30 m. It has a white dial with Roman numerals. It uses the automatic calibre 25, with a 192-hour power reserve. Its functions include date, tourbillon and power reserve indicator.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Villeret Tourbillon 8 Jours
- Status
- Unknown
Dial
- Colour
- White
- Indices
- Roman numerals
- Hands
- Leaf
Movement
- Calibre
- Blancpain 25
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 192 h
- Jewels
- 29
- Functions
- DateHoursMinutesPower Reserve IndicatorTourbillon Escapement
- Complications
- DatePower reserve indicatorTourbillon
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 37.5 mm
- Thickness
- 10.3 mm
- Lug width
- 20 mm
- Material
- 18k rose gold
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 30 m
Talk
Closest by specs
- BreguetClassique 51785178BR/29/9V6 D000Same: 38 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic

- BreguetClassique 51775177BR/29/9V6Same: 38 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic

- Patek PhilippeAnnual Calendar 49484948R-001Same: 38 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic

- LonginesElegant CollectionL4.787.8.11Same: 37 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic

- LonginesElegant CollectionL4.787.8.12Same: 37 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic

- IWC SchaffhausenPortofino AutomaticIW353321Same: 38 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic
- IWC SchaffhausenPortofino AutomaticIW353319Same: 38 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic
- PaneraiLuminor Due 38 AutomaticPAM00756Same: 38 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.