No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Senator Automatic
Reference1-39-59-01-02
- Case
- 40 mm · Stainless steel
- Thickness
- 9.9 mm
- Water
- 50 m
- Calibre
- 39-59 · 40 h
- Dial
- Silver
Description
The Glashütte Original Senator Automatic 1-39-59-01-02 was introduced in 2011. It has a 40 mm stainless steel case, 9.9 mm thick and water-resistant to 50 m. It has a silver dial with Roman numerals. It uses the automatic calibre 39-59, with a 40-hour power reserve.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Senator Automatic
- Status
- Unknown
- Introduced
- 2011
Dial
- Colour
- Silver
- Indices
- Roman numerals
Movement
- Calibre
- Glashütte Original 39-59
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 40 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 25
- Functions
- HoursMinutesSeconds
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 40 mm
- Thickness
- 9.9 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 50 m
Talk
Closest by specs
- Glashütte OriginalPanoMaticLunar1-90-02-42-32Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve

- Jaeger-LeCoultreMaster Control MemovoxQ411843JSame: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 44 h reserve

- Baume & MercierClassima 10215M0A10215Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve

- Baume & MercierClassima 10263M0A10263Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve

- Jaeger-LeCoultreMaster Control MemovoxQ4118420Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 45 h reserve
- ZenithElite Moon Phase 4003.3100.692/01Same: 40.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 50 h reserve
- NOMOS GlashütteLudwig neomatik 41 Datum 75 Jahre Grundgesetz262 S3Same: 40.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserve
- ZenithElite Tourbillon03.2190.4041/01Same: 40 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 50 mSame: AutomaticSame: 50 h reserve
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.