No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Endeavour Centre Seconds Concept, Rose Gold, Midnight Blue Fumé Dial
Reference1343-0107
- Case
- 40.8 mm · 18k rose gold
- Thickness
- 10.9 mm
- Calibre
- H. Moser & Cie HMC 343 · 168 h
- Dial
- Blue
Description
The H. Moser & Cie. Endeavour Centre Seconds Concept, Rose Gold, Midnight Blue Fumé Dial 1343-0107 is a limited edition of 10 pieces, introduced in 2015. It has a 40.8 mm 18k rose gold case, 10.9 mm thick. It has a blue sunburst dial with mixed indices. It uses the hand-wound H. Moser & Cie calibre HMC 343, with a 168-hour power reserve. Its functions include power reserve indicator.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Endeavour Centre Seconds Concept, Rose Gold, Midnight Blue Fumé Dial
- Status
- Limited edition
- Introduced
- 2015
Dial
- Colour
- Blue
- Pattern
- Sunburst
- Indices
- Mixed
- Hands
- Leaf
Movement
- Calibre
- H. Moser & Cie HMC 343
- Type
- Manual winding
- Power reserve
- 168 h
- Frequency
- 18,000 vph (2.5 Hz)
- Jewels
- 26
- Functions
- HoursMinutesPower Reserve IndicatorSeconds
- Complications
- Power reserve indicator
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 40.8 mm
- Thickness
- 10.9 mm
- Material
- 18k rose gold
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
Talk
Closest by specs
- H. Moser & Cie.Endeavour Centre Seconds Funky Blue,1343-0108Same: 40.8 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: Blue dialSame: ManualSame: 168 h reserve
- H. Moser & Cie.Endeavour Moon1348-0100Same: 40.8 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: Blue dialSame: ManualSame: 168 h reserve
- IWC SchaffhausenPortuguese Chrono-RattrapanteIW371218Same: 40.9 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: Blue dialSame: Manual
- IWC SchaffhausenPortuguese Chrono-RattrapanteIW371215Same: 40.9 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: Blue dialSame: Manual
- Audemars PiguetRoyal Oak Ultra Thin Tourbillon26522OR.OO.1220OR.01Same: 41 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: Blue dialSame: Manual
- Audemars PiguetRoyal Oak Ultra Thin Tourbillon26510OR.OO.1220OR.01Same: 41 mmSame: Rose gold 18kSame: Blue dialSame: Manual
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.