No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Big Pilot Patrouille Suisse
ReferenceIW500910
- Case
- 46.2 mm · Stainless steel
- Thickness
- 15.8 mm
- Water
- 60 m
- Calibre
- IWC 51011 · 168 h
- Dial
- Grey
Description
The IWC Schaffhausen Big Pilot Patrouille Suisse IW500910 is a limited edition of 250 pieces, introduced in 2015. It has a 46.2 mm stainless steel case, 15.8 mm thick and water-resistant to 60 m. It has a grey sunburst dial with Arabic numerals. It uses the automatic IWC calibre 51011, with a 168-hour power reserve. Its functions include date, power reserve indicator and small seconds.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Big Pilot Patrouille Suisse
- Status
- Discontinued
- Introduced
- 2015
- Discontinued
- 2015
Dial
- Colour
- Grey
- Pattern
- Sunburst
- Indices
- Arabic numerals
- Hands
- Alpha
Movement
- Calibre
- IWC 51011
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 168 h
- Frequency
- 21,600 vph (3 Hz)
- Jewels
- 44
- Functions
- DateHoursMinutesPower Reserve IndicatorSmall Seconds
- Complications
- DatePower reserve indicatorSmall seconds
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 46.2 mm
- Thickness
- 15.8 mm
- Lug width
- 22 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Solid
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 60 m
Talk
Closest by specs
- IWC SchaffhausenBig Pilot’s Watch Annual Calendar SpitfireIW502702Same: 46.2 mmSame: SteelSame: Grey dialSame: 60 mSame: AutomaticSame: 168 h reserve
- IWC SchaffhausenBig Pilot’s Watch Right-HanderIW501012Same: 46.2 mmSame: SteelSame: Grey dialSame: 60 mSame: AutomaticSame: 168 h reserve
- OrisAquis Small Second, Date01 743 7673 4137Same: 46 mmSame: SteelSame: Grey dialSame: AutomaticDiffers: 500 m
- OrisAquis Small Second, Date01 743 7673 4157Same: 46 mmSame: SteelSame: Grey dialSame: AutomaticDiffers: 500 m
- BreitlingNavitimer B01 Chronograph 46 GermanyAB01376A1B1Same: 46 mmSame: SteelSame: Grey dialSame: AutomaticDiffers: 30 m
- ZenithEl Primero Sport03.2280.400/91Same: 46 mmSame: SteelSame: Grey dialSame: AutomaticDiffers: 200 m
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.