No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Big Pilot’s Watch Perpetual Calendar Toto Wolff x Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team
ReferenceIW503607
- Case
- 46.2 mm
- Thickness
- 15.4 mm
- Water
- 60 m
- Calibre
- IWC 52615 · 168 h
- Dial
- Skeleton / openworked
Description
The IWC Schaffhausen Big Pilot’s Watch Perpetual Calendar Toto Wolff x Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team IW503607 is a limited edition of 100 pieces, introduced in 2021. It has a 46.2 mm case, 15.4 mm thick and water-resistant to 60 m. It has a skeleton / openworked sunburst dial with Arabic numerals. It uses the automatic IWC calibre 52615, with a 168-hour power reserve. Its functions include date, day, month, perpetual calendar, moon phase, power reserve indicator and small seconds.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Big Pilot's Watch Perpetual Calendar Toto Wolff x Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team
- Status
- Limited edition
- Introduced
- 2021
Dial
- Colour
- Skeleton / openworked
- Pattern
- Sunburst
- Indices
- Arabic numerals
- Hands
- Alpha
Movement
- Calibre
- IWC 52615
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 168 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 54
- Functions
- DateDayHoursMinutesMonthMoonphasePerpetual CalendarPower Reserve IndicatorSmall SecondsYear Indicator
- Complications
- DateDayMonthMoon phasePerpetual calendarPower reserve indicatorSmall seconds
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 46.2 mm
- Thickness
- 15.4 mm
- Lug width
- 22 mm
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 60 m
Talk
Closest by specs
This watchBig Pilot’s Watch Perpetual Calendar Toto Wolff x Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team IW50360746.2 mmSkeleton dial60 mAutomatic168 h reserve - IWC SchaffhausenBig Pilot’s Watch Perpetual Calendar TOP GUN Ceratanium®IW503604Same: 46.2 mmSame: 60 mSame: AutomaticSame: 168 h reserveDiffers: Black dial

- IWC SchaffhausenBig Pilot’s Watch Perpetual CalendarIW503605Same: 46.2 mmSame: 60 mSame: AutomaticSame: 168 h reserveDiffers: Blue dial

Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.