No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Portofino Hand-Wound Eight Days
ReferenceIW510103
- Case
- 45 mm · Stainless steel
- Thickness
- 12 mm
- Water
- 30 m
- Calibre
- IWC 59210 · 192 h
- Dial
- Silver
Description
The IWC Schaffhausen Portofino Hand-Wound Eight Days IW510103 was introduced in 2011. It has a 45 mm stainless steel case, 12 mm thick and water-resistant to 30 m. It has a silver dial with mixed indices. It uses the hand-wound IWC calibre 59210, with a 192-hour power reserve. Its functions include date, power reserve indicator and small seconds.
Specifications
General
Dial
- Colour
- Silver
- Indices
- Mixed
- Hands
- Leaf
Movement
- Calibre
- IWC 59210
- Type
- Manual winding
- Power reserve
- 192 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 30
- Functions
- DateHoursMinutesPower Reserve IndicatorSmall Seconds
- Complications
- DatePower reserve indicatorSmall seconds
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 45 mm
- Thickness
- 12 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 30 m
Same collection
See allTalk
Closest by specs
- BreitlingNavitimer RattrapanteAB0310211G1Same: 45 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 30 m
- BreitlingNavitimer RattrapanteAB0311211G1Same: 45 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 30 m
- IWC SchaffhausenPortuguese Hand-Wound PandaIW545405Same: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 30 mSame: ManualDiffers: 44 mm
- IWC SchaffhausenTribute to Pallweber Edition 150 YearsIW505003Same: 45 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: ManualDiffers: Blue dial
- Patek PhilippeCubitus Date 455821/1A-001Same: 45 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mDiffers: Green dial

- BreguetClassique Répétition Minutes 76397639BB/6D/9XV DD0DSame: 44.5 mmSame: Silver dialSame: 30 mSame: ManualDiffers: White gold 18k

- PaneraiRadiomir 8 GiorniPAM02088Same: 45 mmSame: SteelSame: ManualSame: 192 h reserveDiffers: Green dialDiffers: 100 m

- PaneraiRadiomir 8 GiorniPAM01347Same: 45 mmSame: SteelSame: ManualSame: 192 h reserveDiffers: Brown dialDiffers: 100 m

Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.



