No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Master Collection 29 Two Tone Rose
ReferenceL2.257.5.67
- Case
- 29 mm · Stainless steel
- Water
- 30 m
- Calibre
- L595 · 40 h
- Dial
- Brown
Description
The Longines Master Collection 29 Two Tone Rose L2.257.5.67 has a 29 mm stainless steel case, water-resistant to 30 m. It has a brown sunburst dial with diamond-set indices. It uses the automatic calibre L595, with a 40-hour power reserve. Its functions include date.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Master Collection 29 Two Tone Rose
- Status
- Unknown
Dial
- Colour
- Brown
- Pattern
- Sunburst
- Indices
- Diamond-set
- Hands
- Leaf
Movement
- Calibre
- Longines L595
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 40 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 20
- Functions
- DateHoursMinutesSeconds
- Complications
- Date
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 29 mm
- Lug width
- 15 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Solid
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 30 m
Talk
Closest by specs
- NOMOS GlashütteTetra+ Blasser Zonenmilchling481Same: 29.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Brown dialSame: 30 mSame: 43 h reserve
- NOMOS GlashütteTetra² Männertreu465Same: 29.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Brown dialSame: 30 mSame: 43 h reserve
- Jaeger-LeCoultreRendez-Vous Classic Night & DayQ3468430Same: 29 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserveDiffers: Silver dial
- Jaeger-LeCoultreRendez-Vous Classic Night & DayQ3468410Same: 29 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserveDiffers: Silver dial
- LonginesMaster CollectionL2.257.4.77Same: 29 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 45 h reserveDiffers: Silver dial
- LonginesMaster CollectionL2.257.4.78Same: 29 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 45 h reserveDiffers: Silver dial
- OrisFrank Sinatra Lady Date01 561 7573 4061Same: 29 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserveDiffers: Grey dial
- OrisFrank Sinatra Lady Date01 561 7573 4064Same: 29 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserveDiffers: Black dial
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.