No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Record 26mm
ReferenceL2.320.0.57
Longines2017
- Case
- 26 mm · Stainless steel
- Water
- 30 m
- Calibre
- L592.4 · 40 h
- Dial
- Black
Description
The Longines Record 26mm L2.320.0.57 was introduced in 2017. It has a 26 mm stainless steel case, water-resistant to 30 m. It has a black dial with diamond-set indices. It uses the automatic calibre L592.4, with a 40-hour power reserve. Its functions include date.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Record 26mm
- Status
- Unknown
- Introduced
- 2017
Dial
- Colour
- Black
- Indices
- Diamond-set
- Hands
- Dauphine
Movement
- Calibre
- Longines L592.4
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 40 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 22
- Functions
- ChronometerDateHoursMinutesSeconds
- Complications
- Date
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 26 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 30 m
Talk
Variants
| Code | Dial |
|---|---|
| 2 | Black |
| 6 | — |
Closest by specs
- LonginesFlagship ClassicL4.274.4.57Same: 26 mmSame: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 45 h reserve
- LonginesPresence 25.5 AutomaticL4.321.4.97Same: 25.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve
- OrisRectangular01 561 7783 4065Same: 25.5 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserveDiffers: Blue dial
- OrisRectangular01 561 7783 4063Same: 25.5 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserveDiffers: Green dial
- OmegaDe Ville Mini Trésor428.15.26.60.04.002Same: 26 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: 48 h reserveDiffers: White dial
- OmegaDe Ville Mini Trésor428.15.26.60.04.001Same: 26 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: 48 h reserveDiffers: White dial
- Jaeger-LeCoultreReverso Classic Monoface Small SecondsQ2438522Same: 25.5 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: 42 h reserveDiffers: Silver dial
- Jaeger-LeCoultreReverso Classic Duoface Small SecondsQ2458422Same: 25.5 mmSame: SteelSame: 30 mSame: 42 h reserveDiffers: Silver dial
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.