No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Master Collection Date 47.5
ReferenceL2.689.4.51
- Case
- 47.5 mm · Stainless steel
- Water
- 30 m
- Calibre
- L691.2 · 46 h
- Dial
- Black
Description
The Longines Master Collection Date 47.5 L2.689.4.51 has a 47.5 mm stainless steel case, water-resistant to 30 m. It has a black dial with Roman numerals. It uses the automatic calibre L691.2, with a 46-hour power reserve. Its functions include date.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Master Collection Date 47.5
- Status
- Unknown
Dial
- Colour
- Black
- Indices
- Roman numerals
- Hands
- Leaf
Movement
- Calibre
- Longines L691.2
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 46 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 24
- Functions
- DateHoursMinutesSeconds
- Complications
- Date
Case
- Shape
- Round
- Diameter
- 47.5 mm
- Lug width
- 25 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 30 m
Talk
Variants
| Code | Dial |
|---|---|
| 5 | Black |
| 6 | Black |
Closest by specs
- LonginesTwenty-Four HoursL2.751.4.53Same: 47.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 48 h reserve
- LonginesLindbergh’s Atlantic Voyage WatchL2.730.4.58Same: 47.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 46 h reserve
- PaneraiRadiomir 1940 AcciaioPAM00399Same: 47 mmSame: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: 55 h reserve
- PaneraiRadiomir 1936PAM00249Same: 47 mmSame: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: 56 h reserve
- OrisBig Crown Timer Chronograph01 675 7648 4234Same: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 48 h reserveDiffers: 46 mm
- OrisBig Crown X1 Calculator01 675 7648 4264Same: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 48 h reserveDiffers: 46 mm
- BreitlingNavitimer 1 Chronograph GMTA24322121B2Same: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserveDiffers: 46 mm
- BreitlingNavitimer WorldA24322121B1Same: SteelSame: Black dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserveDiffers: 46 mm
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.