No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Luminor Due 38 Automatic Luna Rosa
ReferencePAM01306
Panerai2022
- Case
- 38 mm · Stainless steel
- Water
- 30 m
- Calibre
- OP XXXIV · 72 h
- Dial
- White
Description
The Panerai Luminor Due 38 Automatic Luna Rosa PAM01306 was introduced in 2022. It has a 38 mm stainless steel case, water-resistant to 30 m. It has a white dial with Arabic numerals. It uses the automatic calibre OP XXXIV, with a 72-hour power reserve. Its functions include date and small seconds.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Luminor Due 38 Automatic Luna Rosa
- Status
- Unknown
- Introduced
- 2022
Dial
- Colour
- White
- Indices
- Arabic numerals
- Hands
- Baton
Movement
- Calibre
- Panerai OP XXXIV
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 72 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 25
- Functions
- DateHoursMinutesSmall Seconds
- Complications
- DateSmall seconds
Case
- Shape
- Cushion
- Diameter
- 38 mm
- Lug width
- 20 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Solid
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 30 m
Talk
Closest by specs
- LonginesRecordL2.820.4.11Same: 38.5 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 72 h reserve

- LonginesFlagship Heritage MoonphaseL4.815.4.78Same: 38.5 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 72 h reserve

- PaneraiLuminor Piccolo Due 38 AutomaticPAM01043Same: 38 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 72 h reserve
- PaneraiLuminor Piccolo Due 38 AutomaticPAM01426Same: 38 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: AutomaticSame: 72 h reserve
- OrisArtelier Date01 733 7810 4051Same: 38 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic

- IWC SchaffhausenPortofino AutomaticIW353301Same: 38 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic
- IWC SchaffhausenPortofino AutomaticIW353303Same: 38 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic
- NOMOS GlashütteTangomat A Century of Bauhaus601 S10Same: 38.3 mmSame: SteelSame: White dialSame: 30 mSame: Automatic
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.