No photo yet
Drawn in its dial colour until there is one.
Monaco Calibre 11 Silver &
ReferenceCAW211C
TAG Heuer2011
- Case
- 39 mm · Stainless steel
- Water
- 100 m
- Calibre
- TAG Heuer 11 · 40 h
- Dial
- Silver
Description
The TAG Heuer Monaco Calibre 11 Silver & CAW211C was introduced in 2011. It has a 39 mm stainless steel case, water-resistant to 100 m. It has a silver dial with mixed indices. It uses the automatic calibre 11, with a 40-hour power reserve. Its functions include date, chronograph and small seconds.
Specifications
General
- Model name
- Monaco Calibre 11 Silver &
- Status
- Unknown
- Introduced
- 2011
Dial
- Colour
- Silver
- Indices
- Mixed
- Hands
- Baton
Movement
- Calibre
- TAG Heuer 11
- Type
- Automatic
- Power reserve
- 40 h
- Frequency
- 28,800 vph (4 Hz)
- Jewels
- 59
- Functions
- ChronographDateHoursMinutesSmall Seconds
- Complications
- ChronographDateSmall seconds
Case
- Shape
- Square
- Diameter
- 39 mm
- Material
- Stainless steel
- Caseback
- Display (sapphire)
- Crystal
- Sapphire
- Water resistance
- 100 m
Talk
Closest by specs
- Tudor192691550Same: 39 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve
- Tudor192691551Same: 39 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve
- TAG HeuerCarrera AutomaticWBN2015Same: 39 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve
- TAG HeuerCarrera AutomaticWBN2019Same: 39 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 38 h reserve
- OmegaSpeedmaster Date 393813.30Same: 39 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 46 h reserve
- Jaeger-LeCoultreGeophysic 1958Q8008520Same: 38.5 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 40 h reserve
- OmegaDe Ville Co-Axial 38.7 GMT4533.31Same: 38.7 mmSame: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 48 h reserve
- NOMOS GlashütteClub Sport neomatik Worldtimer silver791Same: SteelSame: Silver dialSame: 100 mSame: AutomaticSame: 42 h reserveDiffers: 40 mm
Something missing or wrong?
Members can suggest a fix; an editor checks it before it goes in.